
Nacho
Libre


My
Old Man always had this thing about comedies. He loves everything from the
classic Caddyshack to the 1990 Crime Against Humanity Spaced Invaders.
And there were plenty of other milestones and turds in between, but as I watched
a lot of the ones that fell into the latter category with him, he would sit
there and howl like a banshee if he wasn’t giggling like an idiot. He looked
like he got hit with the smilex from the first Batman movie, it was
so bad. And through most of these movies he would look over at my unamused
face and tell me, “it’s so stupid its funny.”
Needless to say,
I never understood it. I just thought he lost his mind and was willing to
let it go at that. But lately in my older age I’ve come to understand my father
a bit more. I comprehend more and more why he did the things he did when I
was younger, and when I watched Nacho Libre, I finally understood what
my father meant when he’d shriek to the point of embarrassment as he said
a movie was stupid.
Nacho Libre
stars Jack Black as a Mexican monk who secretly becomes a pro wrestler
to make better food for orphans. The concept in itself is pretty dumb and
could go either way, but when you have Jared Hess (Napoleon Dynamite)
directing, that’s when things get enjoyably effed up.
An appreciation
of completely random humor is necessary to enjoying Nacho Libre. Jack
Black doesn’t play the traditional unofficially coked-out screwhead that he
holds a pending patent on. His character Nacho’s idea of hitting on a woman
(a nun, no less) is asking her back to his quarters to enjoy some toast, which
would flop in any other movie made by almost any other director. But when
tossed onto the screen by the director of Napoleon Dynamite, it’s gold.
If you watched
Napoleon Dynamite and spent more time scratching your head or mentally
composing a shopping list, you shouldn’t bother with Nacho Libre. It’s
just as disjointed as Hess’ last movie and relies or bizarre humor just as
much. If you’re a wrestling enthusiast, I’d recommend huffing some paint thinner
and drinking cosmic quantities of Red Bull for maximum enjoyment of this movie.
Just remember that it’s illegal for anyone over 14 to wear a mask, if you’re
feeling Ray Mysterio at any point.
The
Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift



When
I saw the trailer for The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift all I could
think of was some drunken, coked out bet between some Hollywood studio executives.
If you haven’t seen the preview for the movie, it’s inherently ridiculous.
First and foremost, it’s the third in the series where the actual actors co-star
with muscle cars. Yeah, a real staple in the IROC (Italian Retard Out Cruising)
community. Strike Two comes from Lil’ Bow Wow not only starring in it, but
playing a character named Twinkie. (By the way, I know he goes by Bow Wow
now, but he’ll always be that pint-sized wannabe thug to me and I don’t care
if Master P is his daddy.) But probably the worst of Tokyo Drift’s moving
violations is the fact that it’s seemingly based on of the idea of greasing
your tires with Crisco as you change gears and jerk off the emergency brake.
Watching Tokyo
Drift was a lot like watching Cowboy Bebop after shotgunning three cans
of Jolt back to back before mainlining coffee and Pop Rocks. Part of what
helped me eventually focus was pondering the possibility that no one in the
states would let the producers make another Fast and the Furious movie
in the states.
If you ever do
some stream of consciousness web surfing, you’ll eventually end up at a website
called Engrish.com. It’s dedicated to the phenomenon of misconception that
the Japanese have of American culture. Kind of like when you see some dipshit
with a Japanese character tattooed on his neck. He probably doesn’t know what
it means. Oh sure, he truly believes that it means strength, but in
all reality it probably means garbageman or Pathetic Roundeye Gaijin
Douchebag. Engrish.com proves what little the Japanese know of our culture
through a hilarious gallery of T-shirts, billboards and other cultural artifacts.
Unfortunately,
Tokyo Drift shows that Americans are equally guilty of cultural misinterpretation
as well. We get a peek at the western perception of eastern bathhouses, sumo
wrestling and girls in schoolgirl uniforms. I’ll admit that I know next to
nothing about Japanese culture and as far as it’s concerned I don’t know what
the hell I’m talking about.
But Osaka Bob
does. Osaka Bob lived on the streets of Tokyo for a year and a half back in
the ‘90s. I don’t know why they don’t call him Tokyo Bob instead, but
who am I to screw with a nickname? He infiltrated every aspect of their culture
and there’s nothing you can ask him about that he wouldn’t be able to explain
in great detail. He drank snake sake from a bottle as he (presumably) swore
in Japanese during transitional scenes that were (I’m guessing) supposed to
develop the characters and show off the country. If he wasn’t swearing he
was laughing like a fool. Like a goddamned fool!
After all, The
Fast and the Furious movies amount to is a rehash of a horrible ‘70s movie
premise that only pouring ice water down your pants can erase from your consciousness.
I mean, what does it tell you if even Vin Diesel won’t come back for a second
movie and pretty boy Paul Walker won’t come back for a third? As far as the
cast, it consists largely of people you’ve never heard of and when the verdict’s
out, you will probably never hear from again. But if kung fu legend Sonny
Chiba is lucky, you won’t spot him through the exhaust fumes.
And on a closing
note, I was privy to the spectacle of dingbat motorheads/NASCAR enthusiasts
in the parking lot after the show. God knows I just had to see and hear them
talk shop and revved the engines on their tricked-out Ford Focuses. And they
always—and I mean ALWAYS tear ass two blocks to the nearest Denny’s so they
can look tough as nails while styling wifebeaters and eating a Grease Lover’s
Skillet. A friend of mine who is just as into music as I am into film admits
that he doesn’t hate most bands, just the fans and I’ll admit the same here.
I didn’t hate Tokyo Drift. Don’t get me wrong, it was terrible and
sitting in on an AA meeting seems more appealing in retrospect than sitting
among the Tokyo Drift crowd. But I just didn’t see the point when all
was said and done. After all, what do you think would be more fun—driving
like an idiot or watching people drive like idiots?
The
Lake House




As
much as I don’t like admitting to it, I’m an on again off again fan of Keanu
Reeves’ work. He’s done some decent action movies, like The Matrix and
Constantine. If you’ve seen Point Break, The Devil’s Advocate, Johnny
Mnemonic, Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Much Ado About Nothing or Speed,
you know the man’s an accomplished comedian. And if you caught The Gift,
you’re aware that he can even act from time to time.
But it’s the
sagging-ass romantic dramas that Reeves occasionally does that really get
to me. Not because they’re romantic dramas, but because they’re romantic dramas
that star Keanu Reeves. I’ve seen spokesmen for Big Tobacco who were more
convincing as moralists than Reeves is as a leading man in a romantic drama.
I don’t and won’t buy that at any price. No, sir.
But the producers
of Reeves’ newest romantic drama The Lake House have a new trick up
their sleeves. They realize a story that only tugs at the heartstrings alone
isn’t enough. Desperate office working women who are depressed that American
Idol is over until the fall need more than a truly happy ending or an incredibly
tragic one to rope them into the theaters. No no, they need a gimmick! Every
movie needs a gimmick these days. Pick a movie, any movie. Every movie listed
on the marquee these days is a sequel, computer animated, a remake, based
on a video game/comic book or otherwise gimmicky.
In the case of
The Lake House, it not only stars Keanu Reeves, but it re-pairs him
with Speed co-star Sandra Bullock. You know—because seeing those two
in a crappy action movie together twelve years ago wasn’t bad enough, so lets
stick them in an even worse romantic drama as either a punishment against
them or their audience. I don’t know. Maybe Reeves is still under the impression
that it’s still 1990 and he has to keep doing this sort of movie to retain
his Tiger Beat cover boy status.
So what do we,
the audience, get for our trouble and overprices tickets? We get a dumpy rehash
of the Christopher Reeve/Jane Seymour sap trough Somewhere in Time.
The plot goes something like this: Reeves is an architect with daddy issues
who goes to live in a house his aloof architect father built. Bullock is a
doctor who goes to live in the house two years after he moves out. But he’s
living there exactly two years before she moves in. Somehow they have the
same dog and send love letters to each other through a mailbox that can raise
its own flag and send mail years into the past or future. Eerie. Very eerie
indeed.
At some point
of my viewing The Lake House, I started thinking about how I wish I
watched Donnie Darko again and how much more rewarding The Lake
House would’ve been if the two main characters involved were uggos. Think
about it—they’re mailing each other and when they finally do meet, they’re
both attractive. Or supposed to be attractive, but whatever. It’s kind of
like if you’ve ever posted or answered a personal. You correspond with this
person for… oh, let’s say a couple weeks, a month if you’re cautious. You’re
obviously interested enough to write back in one form or another—but when
you eventually meet and you see those fat little sausage fingers, the lazy
eye, the resemblance to Darlene from Roseanne, the rose tattoo on the vein-ridden
ankle and get called “dude” more times than you care to remember? Well that’s
when biology takes over and you’re running for the hills.
The Lake House
would be a vaguely interesting movie if it didn’t have more holes in
it than Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow. Time travel is usually an intriguing
enough concept, but it’s also one that a screenwriter has to really think
through before laying it out. But instead of, I don’t know, ACTUALLY THINKING,
writer David Auburn seemed to rely on star power as opposed to critical and
rational thought. Considering these stars’ lowbrow appeal, this is a commercially
wise move. I can picture (not really) running into this guy and asking him
how half the crap in this movie was actually supposed to happen and I see
this guy stammering or quickly replying something to the effect of it not
mattering then telling me that “Sandy” looked angelic. Bah!
Garfield:
A Tale of Two Kitties



If
you go to www.tomcruiseisnuts.com,
one thing is for certain---you will laugh yourself sterile. In addition to
your day’s required intake of random nonsense, you’ll also uncover some true
nuggets of wisdom. Take this one for instance. In the quotes from Tom Cruise,
namely in the Tom on Tom section, the first one reads, “I’m usually
nervous to meet people that I admire because what if they’re not cool or something?”
If that’s not pure gold I don’t know what is.
Cruise would
be right if I actually thought of this and actually stood a chance of meeting
people I admire. At least in a celebrity capacity. I’m talking about Bill
Murray here. The man’s always struck me as incredibly cool and when he did
the first Garfield movie, I told myself that at least he didn’t show
his face in it. The movie was generally dumb and anything that’s got Breckin
Meyer and Jennifer Love Hewitt as two of the main characters has got to be
the stuff that nightmares are made of. It was like the part in Ed Wood
where the one producer looked at Wood’s footage and thought it was a joke
concocted by Billy Wellman. But this was cleverly disguised as a kids’ movie,
and because Bill Murray had something to do with it all was forgiven. So
now we toss the fat, decades-too-late computer-animated cat over the drink
to Europe and throw in a case of mistaken identity and we’re all supposed
to piss ourselves with laughter. I’m not sure what brought this on, but I
don’t like it.
Speaking of what
brought this on, what could’ve brought this on? Not only do we have Bill
Murray voicing a computer program when there’s clearly no need, but we’ve
got another would-be grade-A disappointment if you look at who co-wrote Garfield:
A Tale of Two Kitties. It was co-written by Joel Cohen. I saw this and
I started having chest pains. I thought of the director and co-writer of such
latter-day classics as Fargo, Miller’s Crossing, O Brother Where Art Thou?,
Raising Arizona, and The Big Lebowski. Part of me died when I saw
his name in the credits and I quietly sobbed throughout the entire feature.
I watched Garfield through teary eyes. I knew that his resume started
dropping off over the past few years, but I had to ask myself if things really
got this bad. Fortunately, I did a little research and found that it’s a completely
different Joel Cohen. This guy wrote Cheaper by the Dozen. BEAST publisher
Paul Fallon is currently preparing a frivolous lawsuit I have every intention
of filing against the producers of A Tale of Two Kitties.
I didn’t enjoy
A Tale of Two Kitties for the near-death experience I went through
for nearly an hour and a half. I’m all for an emotional reaction when I see
a movie, but you don’t pull cheap shots during the credits and send people
into panic attacks. I’ve got to call bullshit on that one. Then there’s the
title. Come on! When you’ve got to resort to a sorry play on words while referencing
a Dickens novel that the vast majority of your audience hasn’t and probably
won’t read, you’re either suffering from a case of big fish in a small
pond syndrome or you need to adjust your dosage. However, there is good
news. If you’re a parent, you’ve probably seen movies such as A Tale of
Two Kitties a dozen times already and your soul is all but dead. You’ve
lost the will to live/fight and on your kids 18th birthday you’ll
find out it was never yours.
A
Prairie Home Companion


Just
a heads up, and you can take this any way you want, but this is going to be
a pretty short review. Reason being is I don’t really have anything bad to
say about A Prairie Home Companion. The few episodes I caught of the
Prairie Home Companion radio show I’ve enjoyed very much and it’s always done
its job—to make me and its listeners forget it was going to be over soon and
also about our generally mundane lives as it entertains in an incredibly witty,
warm and correct way.
A Prairie
Home Companion tells the story of the last episode of the show (don’t
worry, its not going off the air) and its best efforts of creator Garrison
Keillor to keep it business as usual before a parking lot is made out of the
show’s theater.
There are a lot
of great performances by Woody Harrelson, Meryl Streep, Lily Tomlin, Kevin
Kline, and… Lindsay Lohan. Yeah, I thought I was in Bizarro World when I saw
Lindsay Lohan in a Robert Altman film let alone an actual movie, but more
likely it’s a sign of the upcoming apocalypse. Either way it was nice.
There’s lots
of great improvisation, namely between Streep and Tomlin, but it’s definitely
Altman who’s running the show. He creates this incredibly warm atmosphere
despite the impending doom the show is facing thought great characters and
Keillor’s wonderful dialogue which returns from the brink of pretentiousness
on just a couple of occasions.
I was really
surprised as to how much I enjoyed this film. But what surpassed my enjoyment
was my puzzlement as I can’t for the life of me figure out what a hell a treat
like this was doing being released in the Season of the Blockbuster. I guess
A Prairie Home Companion is the prize at the bottom of that box of
sugar-coated, indigestible Cracker Jacks.
Cars




Summertime
means school’s out, which also means that there are leagues of ADHD-ridden
kids demanding extracurricular entertainment. There was a time when this problem
was remedied with a summer reading list, summer camp or Ritalin. Now, instead
of mental activity, physical exercise or a somewhat socially unacceptable
medication, you can sit the little bastards down in an air-conditioned theater
and treat the symptoms instead of the problem.
This summer’s
CGI extravaganza is Cars. It’s basically the same milquetoast kids
crap rehashed from last summer except instead of being about humans, ogres,
toys or insects, all the characters are, well, cars. A hotshot car that gets
knocked back to the boonies to get its groove back with all the other burnouts
and blahblahblah. Oh sure, the animation was impressive—actually, it looked
just like the Pixar animation that every other computer animated cartoon employs.
All execution and no real style.
But I had a real
problem with Cars. I couldn’t figure out if it was a recruiting film
for the next generation of NASCAR fans or a remake of the 1991 Michael J.
Fox vehicle Doc Hollywood. Owen Wilson plays the hotshot car that ends
up in the backwoods of a ghost town with some yokel residents voiced by Paul
Newman, George Carlin and Bonnie Hunt.
I had the fortune
of taking a mouthy kid to this, to see if I’d enjoy one of these newfangled
movies with someone for which it was intended. I took my friend’s 8-year-old
daughter Sarah and all she did was bitch about how “gay” it was. She complained
that Cars had none of the oomph that other Pixar films such
as The Incredibles and Toy Story had. She just wanted to go
see An Inconvenient Truth so she had some idea what her future held
and whether she should bother aspiring to anything in this life. And she was
the one who brought the Doc Hollywood comparison to my attention. Sarah
was kind of a drag throughout most of the event, but the thing that made the
whole day worthwhile for me was that she also found it funny that Larry the
Cable Guy played a retarded tow truck in Cars. She threatened to leave
if she heard the words “git ‘r’ done.” Now that I think about it, I did briefly
date her mom for a spell there back in the ‘90s…