|Dec 14 - Jan 12, 2006
FIENDS LIKE THESE
VEE VILL BURY YOU
no one is going to get your whole revolution against the local government because as soon as anyone finds out you encouraged all that shit theyre going to empty out every last beast box.
CUTLER & RUN
when i tried to hold his spokesman accountable in the media,for a running from motorcycle accident,on 10/15/2005,he got off with disorderly conduct,da clark said that he did not think that the plea was inappropreate,well i bet if it was him who got hit it would have been a totaly different out come.These people in power think that they are above the LAW.After i found out what they did and contacted channel 2 news,they did almost there whole news cast on it on,02/28/2006,BROWN STATED THAT THE FACT THIS IS COMING OUT NOW,DISCREDITS ARE LEGAL SYSTEM AND WHO THE F--- ARE THEY KIDDING,THEY ARE THE ONE'S WHO DISCREDIT THE LEGAL SYSTEM.IT SEEMS THAT ONLY THE POLITICALLY CONNECTED OR THE WEALTHY,CAN GAT OFF OF ANYTHING THEY CHOOSE AND THE LITTLE GUY GETS SCREWED! COME ON THAT WAS A PRANK/JOKE ,CHILL OUT AND GET SENSE OF HUMOR. HIS SPOKESMAN BECAUSE OF WHO HE IS AND WHO HE KNOWS WALKED AWAY FROM A D.W.I. AND A HIT-N-RUN/INJURYS.I'M THE THE ONE HE HIT AND HAVE HAD TO HAVE NECK SURGERY AND NOW HAVE A PLATE AND SCREWS IN MY NECK THANKS TO HIS NIGHT OUT ON THE TOWN,AND LOOKING AT BACK SURGERY NEXT,AND CLARK THINKS THAT THE PLEA WAS FINE,THAT'S ARE LEGAL SYSTEM,THAT DISCREDITS THE LEGAL SYSTEM,BUT IT WILL ALL COME OUT IN THE TRIAL,FACTS OF WHAT HAPPEN THAT NIGHT AND WHO'S TELLING THE TRUTH!!!!
We think you’re a tough mofo for chasing Cutler across town after he hit you, and we think the whole sordid story is disgusting, the kind of thing that makes you just hate everyone in our astoundingly unethical government. That’s why we hope you’ll listen to our advice: if you want people to take you seriously, and not to dismiss you as some crazy crank, you’ve got to lay off the caps lock key. You sound stupid, inarticulate and insane. If we hadn’t already heard about your story, we’d have pegged you as just another delusional paranoid with an unbelievable story of imagined persecution. Speak softly, Keith, and let the truth be your hammer. And try the spell-checking tool. Good luck.
Just wanted to know if you guys were up on the Seattle usage of the term "santorum"--it is defined as the fecal matter, cum and lube that you squirt out after having anal sex without a condom [Matt Taibbi, “Dialing for Santorum,” issue 111]. Can't take credit for it myself but I think it's a fairly apt term, and one that really doesn't have any synonyms per se. So if anything thank you Senor Santorum for giving a name to a heretofore unclaimed substance. PS great paper I want all your balls in my mouth
"Fuck yeah!" is putting it mildly, yet it kept falling out of my mouth as I read [Allan Uthman, “Crush, Kill, Destroy,” issue 110]. It's a shame his stupidity isn't a crime. His own father would impeach him for that.
Freakin' brilliant [“The BEAST Page 3 Featureless Internet Kitsch,” issue #111]. You guys nailed him/them right on the head. I laughed out loud at the spot-on details.
OSAMA FOR YOUR MAMA
AL-QAEDA SAYS IT'S WINNING THE WAR.
Al-Qaeda is also gloating over Donald Rumsfeld resignation. When we cut and run from Iraq, as per the Democrat plan, al-Qaeda will claim victory over the United States and then they will folllow us back home to the U.S.. The terrorists welcomed a Democrat win as their victory.
You wanted change? You're gonna get change when Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups hit our homeland. Where will we run then? Where?
Osama bin Laden responds:
CLINTON DID IT
"But so far his only attacks on Reynolds have been about his pet issue—the loss of domestic jobs to China." [Allan Uthman, “Con,” issue 107]
Try telling the whole truth.
It was Bill Clinton who made the China a "Favorite trading partner." And got China into the WTO. Also Clinton was signs NAFTA and trade deals with Vietnam And India.
GREAT NAME FOR PORN
This is so ridiculous. Politics and religion give me this ookie feeling…
Ted Haggard is going through a lot of pain and uncertainty right now, and the question is: Does he deserve our compassion?
We all make mistakes, sure – but it makes sense to measure men by their capacity to admit, and correct them. But what if some of them don’t know how?
What if a man has made so many errors, that his only psychological option is to rationalize and lie to others? I know, it sounds impossible…
The more a dishonest man has at stake, the more he will lie to prevent the consequences of his actions.
Years ago, I was being trained as a bartender by a man whom I don’t particularly admire. One day, in one of his vain attempts to “teach me about life,” he said, with laughter: “When you get caught for something you know you shouldn’t have done, there are only three rules to abide by: Deny, deny, deny.” I would like to note that he didn’t advise a 19 yr old to use his reason to his best ability, thus enabling himself to better prevent acts of willful evasion and wrongdoing -- but to deny it when he does it.
Well, Haggard has an entire life behind him: A wife, five kids, thousands of associates and followers, and all of his public and private convictions. If he were to admit to the allegations against him, all of this would be compromised; he would be despised by many, especially those who trusted him; he would be publicly known as a hypocrite, a sinner, a fraud who does not practice what he preaches. I have an inkling that he would feel very alone and out of place if he were to consciously admit that he is what he is.
Thus, I am not surprised to hear that he claims he merely received a massage from this man, purchased methamphetamine once, and never tried it. Given the circumstances, what else should I have expected? He must know, on some level, that he has interacted with this man, and that there is some kind of evidence. If he denied the allegations outright, he would be even more suspicious if evidence surfaced connecting him to this man; so, in shame, guilt, and repentance, he admitted to “some” of the evil – i.e. those things which will compromise his integrity to a bearable extent, in order to maintain his greater illusion.
I do not have it in me to hate this man; I feel nothing but pity. He is synonymous to an animal squealing in helplessness from its trap – which it so sloppily walked into.
I am impotent to make his life worse, and I do not desire to. It nauseates me to think of such suffering.
Does he deserve our sympathy? That is for all to answer by their own minds, i.e. by their own standards.
When I read about that German blogger who attacked Taibbi, I experienced more fear thinking about that sort of an incident than the 911 attacks themselves [Matt Taibbi, “Murrah Redux,” issue 109]. If he opposes governments for their evil actions yet gets violently confrontational with Matt for disagreeing with him he no longer has a cause, except defending his machismo. Rather than engaging in rational debate about how to make our world a safer more enjoyable place to live in, some would rather battle for their egos than for social justice.
WHERE WINGS TAKE DREAM
I think part of the issue here is the desire to understand. To be able to grasp the whys when the whys seem incomprehensible to us. The fascination with Dahmer and Gacy.
The whys are not only distracting, but ultimately they are irrelevant. To attempt to assign logic to patterns of behavior that are so outside the norm is fruitless. Why would the government do such and such is the same as why did this corporation dump waste in this river. They had a goal and this was the most expedient way of satisfying that goal.
Both Matt and [sic] referenced thousands of people acting in concert to pull off this conspiracy, and while that is a possiblity, it's a highly unlikely one. As any system becomes more complex, it also becomes more prone to failure. Taking this into account, consider the following:
What is the minimum number of people required to actually pull off the 9/11 attacks?
The answer is 5.
You require four pilots and one person to provide financial support, logistics and intelligence. That's it. Add fourteen additional operatives, who in no way have to know the terminal nature of the plan, for crowd control and you have the official story. The only organization that has provided any type of evidence as to who those people are is our government, which has shown repeatedly how they can manipulate information.
You can add additional levels of complexity, involve other persons or organizations, but as I said, they are not required. I never validated any conspiracy theory or theorist, only stated that the official story is flawed and should be subjected to greater scrutiny. While Matt and [sic] seem perfectly willing to dismiss the entirity of 9/11 conspiracy as just idle nonsense, the official story has one glaring hole in it that personally I have not been able to explain away.
Able Danger could be nothing more than luck, the Pennsylvania crash could be the work of heroes preventing another attack, and the planes that hit the towers could be the planes that we've been told they are.
But, if a 757 hit the Pentagon, why is there no damage to the external facing in proximity to where the wings should have impacted?
I can't rationalize that away. And until I have an explination for that detail, then the official story doesn't fit, which, logically implies only one thing:
One of the things they conspiracy people like to talk about is "the squibs." They point out jets of smoke coming from floors below the impact sites as proof of demolition charges, and say they are occurring before the collapses begin. meaning they are not jets of smoke propelled by the air blast of a free-falling skyscraper.
Well, I have looked at THEIR videos. The players usually allow you to advance them a bit at a time. In the collapse wherin the radio mast sinks straight down (south tower?), you can advance the vid and watch the antenna begin to move down...THEN the "squibs" appear. Not before, but after the collapse begins. They are wrong or lying about their own evidence.
In the other collapse, the section above the impact topples over 10-20 degrees before it begins falling, and it does so as one would expect, by collapsing into the damaged area, where a host of support columns were missing.
All the BS about controlled demolition is so much white noise around the more interesting - and real - question, which is, did the Bush admin allow it to happen, or was it just a case of criminally stupid negligence?
GOOD WORK SLIPPING FAST
Even for intelligent and sensible people, many of the 9/11 conspiracy claims are something that we want to believe for ideological reasons, or constructed in such a way (ie. the titanium passport or the tale of the living hijackers) that it seems hard not to believe that something stranger than we thought happened on 9/11. So, I suppose I want to thank/encourage Taibbi for trying to put the record straight on a lot of issues that have been based on hearsay and riddled with contradictory information. As a decent journalist, you (Taibbi) are used to sticking your nose into things where you're not wanted, and where people don't want to know the ugly truth. And for 9/11 conspiracy theorists, the ugly truth is that Bush probably had nothing to do with the attacks, and that we have let him (masterfully?)manipulate those events to his silly boy-emperor ends. I think you (Taibbi/Beast) should keep up with the work, because it is important for a reasonably unbiased source to compile important information in a way that mainstream media and conspiracy bloggers never would or could, whether it is from bias, incompetence, or that old "we write what people want to read" argument. Anyway, thanks Taibbi/Beast/Guys, and keep up the good work.
send your ill-informed ravings to us here
|MotoSport, Inc.|Netflix DVD Rentals. NO LATE FEES; Free Shipping. Try for FREE! | music123.com | Direct2Drive
T-Shirts only $14.99 when you buy 3 or more at CCS.com | Shutterfly.com | LinkShare Referral Prg
|Popular Favorites from the Archive|
Copyright 2002-2006, The Beast. All rights reserved.