Kino Korner:
Movie
Reviews by Michael Gildea
Mr.
and Mrs. Smith
Every
so often, you’ll hear through the supermarket tabloid grapevine
about a celebrity couple. And you’ll hear about it with
the same rotation that you’ll hear an Ashlee Simpson song
on a hideous top 40 radio station. In other words, constantly.
Oh sure, for about thirty seconds, the same part of you
that would go to a public stoning or hanging is vaguely
intrigued, but for the rest of the six months that you’re
hearing about them over and over, you come to hate said
couple.
And
the torrid romances that the new IT couples are involved
in always begin on the set of the big summer movie that
they’re working on. Remember a couple of years ago when
you couldn’t so much as chug a bottle of cough syrup without
hearing about Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez? It was repulsive!
Then
came Gigli. All the hype. All the candid low-quality
photos. All the buildup! Then what happened? If you didn’t
see the movie in one of its first two showings, you didn’t
get to see it. It got pulled because it was such an assault
on the senses that the studio didn’t want to get hit with
millions of emotional damages lawsuits that they didn’t
stand a chance in hell of winning. And I’m sure the terrible
reviews didn’t help either.
So
here we are. A couple of years later and we run into the
same scenario. Brad Pitt shitcanned a generically dull
Jennifer Aniston a good five months ago and traded up for
irresistible devil woman and Mr. and Mrs. Smith co-star
Angelina Jolie. And we’ve been hearing about it ever since.
So
now the movie’s out and so is the jury. And shockingly,
it isn’t that bad. Pitt and Jolie play a married pair of
assassins stuck in a marriage as boring as the one Pitt
was in with Aniston. So you can see how easy it must have
been for Pitt to relate to the material. So they don’t know
that the other one’s a killer until they’re sent to kill
each other and well... you get the idea.
Pitt
and Jolie have more chemistry than Affleck and Lopez’s ass
had, which is a plus. And the fact that Doug Liman, who
directed such underground hits as Swingers and Go,
not to mention The Bourne Identity definitely helps
out here. Even though the main characters are two of the
most attractive people on the planet, they have the whole
show stolen from them by Vince Vaughn, who plays the fellow
hitman/comic relief/buddy.
Mr.
and Mrs. Smith isn’t phenomenal and it isn’t terrible.
As far as its place in the summer movie lineup, it’s the
okay looking girl in a group of skanks. By comparison, she’s
a goddess. But if you get her alone, you’re going to realize
that you may have sold yourself short.
The
Adventures of Shark Boy and Lava Girl in 3-D
Before
director and cinematic maverick Robert Rodriguez made the
best movie of the year (Sin City) he did a trilogy
of kids’ movies called Spy Kids. If you were a die-hard
fan of Rodriguez’s work, or a kid who could sit through
just about anything, you appreciated those movies, but were
ultimately glad when Rodriguez said he was hanging up the
franchise.
Which
brings us to Sin City. It was gritty, visceral, and
downright fun in a truly sadistic way. And it made up for
the fact that one of the best directors around was putting
all of his energy into kids’ movies. It was like having
one of your friends blow you off three times in a row, then
making up for it with an all expenses paid trip to Vegas.
You were disappointed, but you quickly got over it.
With
The Adventures of Shark Boy and Lava Girl in 3-D,
our buddy Rodriguez is blowing us off again. It looks like
Spy Kids, it sounds like Spy Kids, and it
gives off the same energy as Spy Kids.
And
just like the last Spy Kids movie, it’s done in 3-D.
I remember watching movies in 3-D when I was a kid.
But I don’t remember watching a movie because it was that
specific movie. Hell, I would have watched The Ten Commandments
if it was in 3-D. You could have Ishtar in 3-D
or 2 Fast 2 Furious in 3-D and people would go to see
it. You can hide the worst movie ever as long as you drop
the words “in 3-D” in the title. Miss Congeniality
in 3-D.
But
as I believe I mentioned in my review for Spy Kids 3-D,
the one-blue-eye-and-one-red-eye kind of 3-D doesn’t really
work. Most of the film is in 3-D, which takes away
from the story, turning the finished product into a special
effects circle jerk. The Adventures of Shark Boy and
Lava Girl in 3-D would’ve been much better off without
the gimmicks. Even if it is a kids’ movie.
But
the cool thing about The Adventures of Shark Boy and
Lava Girl in 3-D is that Rodriguez co-wrote it with
his son, Racer. This goes to show that he doesn’t give a
rat’s ass what anyone else but his family thinks about this
film. It’s just like that friend who blew you off. You can’t
be mad at them if it was their kid’s birthday, can you?
The
Honeymooners
And
what would a abhorrent summer at the movies be without a
television show turned into a movie. If The Honeymooners
is any indication of what to expect when Bewitched
and The Dukes of Hazzard hit the screens later this
summer, the goddamned heat’s going to be the least of our
problems this summer.
To
avoid the mistakes that other TV movies have made in the
past, the writers of The Honeymooners have turned
a fat white guy and a skinny white guy into a fat black
guy and a skinny black guy. Some people are so creative.
Part
of the charm of the original Honeymooners show was that
you knew it was going to be over within a half hour. You
don’t get that luxury here. This is like getting a marathon
when you can get through at best two episodes without losing
your shit. And at least in that sort of situation you can
say that at least you didn’t pay to go through that ordeal.
But
here you can’t. You’re paying actual cash to see a pair
of idiots flounder around as a bad situation quickly becomes
a terrible one. To make matters worse, Alice is still a
nagging bitch just like she was on the television show.
The
only good thing about The Honeymooners is that the
otherwise boring Cedric the Entertainer doesn’t act like
a waddling Jackie Gleason impersonator. And Mike Epps doesn’t
act like a black Art Carney.
Other
than that, The Honeymooners sucked. I can see a copy
of this movie on DVD being carried around in a case along
with other implements of torture by some sadistic bastard.
Either that or a photo album of all the bad tattoos I saw
at the Allentown Art Festival. Maybe both.
Cinderella
Man
You
know, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I hate
Russell Crowe, but I respect the man. You hear stories about
him getting arrested for throwing phones at people (okay,
maybe he’s not so bad) and you see interviews with him as
he sits back and lets his enormous ego do the driving.
But
then he puts out great performances in everything he does
and I kind of let it slide.
Crowe
is reunited with his A Beautiful Mind director Ron
Howard for Cinderella Man. If you’re not familiar
with obscure boxers from the depression era, Cinderella
Man is about an obscure boxer from the depression era
who inspired the country to tough it out just a little bit
longer. Riches to rags to riches sort of thing.
If
you saw Seabiscuit a couple of summers ago, you’re
basically watching the same thing and if you didn’t like
that, you’re probably not going to be into Cinderella
Man that much. But if you did get choked up watching
that big dumb animal overcome all obstacles, you’ll probably
weep like a baby watching another big dumb (yet likable)
animal as he rises above.
Cinderella
Man also features Renee Zellweger, who despite marrying
a hick musician still has that look on her face. You know
the one I’m talking about. That squint she constantly has
like she just got punched square in the nose, but there’s
no blood coming out of her nostrils. You’re seeing one thing
and another thing should be happening as a result. And the
fact that it’s not happening is just screwing with your
reality in a big, big way.
So
would I recommend Cinderella Man? Sure. But take
into account that this is coming from a guy who’s a sucker
for period pieces from the early 1900's and boxing movies.
So yeah, I’m a little biased. I’d also recommend it because
it’ll be a welcome break from the crap at the local multiplex.
Lords
of Dogtown
Every
time skateboarding makes a comeback, a terrible movie comes
out to let it know that it’s worn out its welcome. Back
in the late ‘80s when the Tony Hawk shirts were all the
rage, the final nail in the coffin was the Christian Slater
movie Gleaming the Cube. It was a terrible movie
and painted a picture of how skaters were viewed. Of course,
anyone who genuinely loved skating kept doing it and didn’t
make a big deal out of it.
Cut
to a few years ago: The powers that be decided that skateboarding
and extreme sports in general were cool again. Not to mention
MTV fueling Bam Margera’s dipshit impulses. Between Bam
and seeing skaters in juice box commercials, we’ve all been
waiting for the end.
I’m
happy to say that I think it’s finally here. Don’t get me
wrong, I think it’s really cool to watch the occasional
skate video, maybe because I lack the grace and physical
ability to even pull off a one-inch ollie, let alone travel
six feet on a skateboard.
But
a few years back, there was a documentary made by skating
legend Stacy Peralta called Dogtown and Z-Boys. This
documentary featured actual footage of the guys who started
pro skating. It was wild. But with Lords of Dogtown,
you’re just watching a movie version of it and I think it’s
safe to say that it’s way more interesting to watch the
originals do it.
Peralta
wrote the script for Lords of Dogtown, and even though
the movie looks like California in the ‘70s, it just doesn’t
get any “mad air.” You’re better off with the documentary
or hitting the local skate park. And for God’s sake, knock
it off with the stupid-ass baggy pants. Buy a pair that
fits, dammit!
The
Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants
I
thought a lot about The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants
as I checked my e-mail and ditched the spam. I thought about
using a spam filter that works by ditching mail according
to certain words in the subject lines.
Then
I thought about how there should be a shitty movie filter
that works on the same premise. Vanquish movies with certain
words in the title. Maybe words like “two” or “three.” Definitely
“four.” But one word that should guarantee a death sentence
for any movie is “sisterhood” If you disagree, go and check
out Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood.
And
The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants kind of works
on the same horrible concept. One pair of jeans. Four friends
with different shapes. A clever concept of wearing them
for one week and shipping the traveling pants to the next
one. Terrible, terrible, terrible. And to make things worse,
the girl from “Joan of Arcadia” and the alien from “Gilmour
Girls” both star in it.
If
nothing I’ve said yet is deterring you from the trainwreck
of the traveling pants, just go. Good fucking luck. If you
can’t see the horror that this movie contains in the trailer
with the Kelly Clarkson song playing, you deserve anything
and everything that happens to you. You deserve Jehovah’s
witnesses hosting a kegger at your house when you get home.
You deserve ingrown toenails and the abusive co-dependent
relationship you’ve been in for the last six years without
even the slightest mention of engagement. You deserve chronic
diarrhea. Athlete’s foot, thrush, rickets, gout, angina,
anemia, black lung, shortness of breath, loss of appetite,
jaundice, and yellow toenails.